There was no other way to ban X, reports the Ministry of Home Affairs

The Ministry of Interior has submitted a report to the Islamabad High Court on the petition against the closure of social media site X.

The Ministry of Interior has said that no fundamental right of the petitioner has been deprived, the petition should be dismissed, the petition against the closure of X is against the law and facts and cannot be heard.

The report states that X is registered in Pakistan and is not a party to the agreement to abide by Pakistani laws. It was necessary to ban.

The Ministry of Home Affairs said that the FIA ​​Cyber ​​Crime Wing requested X to ban accounts propagating against the Chief Justice, X officials ignored the Cyber ​​Crime Wing’s request and did not even respond Regulatory measures against Cooperation X, including temporary closure, are justified.

The report states that the government has no other option but to temporarily close X. On the request of the intelligence agencies, the Ministry of Interior ordered the closure of X. The decision to close X is to maintain national security and law and order. done for

The report states that social media platforms are being used to spread extremist ideas and false information, X is being used by a few miscreants to harm law and order, to promote instability. X is being used as a tool for

In the report of the Ministry of Interior, it is said that the purpose of the closure of X is not to restrict freedom of expression or access to information, the purpose of the closure of X is the responsible use of social media platforms in accordance with the law. He is the protector and responsible for national stability.

The report said that the social media platform Tik Tok was also banned by the government earlier, the ban was lifted after Tik Tok signed an agreement to abide by Pakistani law.

The Home Ministry report said that the closure of X is not against Article 19 of the Constitution, banning social media platforms across the world for security reasons, and the petition against the closure of X should be dismissed.